Poona Pact of 1932
signed between Mahatma Gandhi and Babasaheb Ambedkar
Today, September 24, is the anniversary of Poona Pact of 1932 signed between Mahatma Gandhi and Babasaheb Ambedkar in Yerwada jail in then Poona (now Pune) in the wake of PM Ramsey MacDonnell’s Communal Award providing for separate electorates for the depressed classes now generally called dalits or Scheduled
Castes. Mahatma Gandhi opposed the Communal Award and went into ‘fast unto death’ in the jail. His health started deteriorating. Obviously, the whole country and the Congress Party were concerned and worried. Since the Communal Award was the net result of Dr. Ambedkr’s untiring and relentless efforts particularly his articulation of the issue of political and social rights of dalits at the Round Table Conferences and other fora, the entire Indian leadership particularly the Hindus persuaded Babasaheb Ambedkar to relent in the interest of cohesiveness of Hindu society and save the life of ‘adamant and stubborn’ Mahatma Gandhi, a staunch Sanatani Hindu. Babasaheb was a visionary leader and a patriotic nationalist from the core agreed in the larger interest of the country and the society at large and signed some understandings with Mahatma Gandhi with regard to the interests of dalits. Those understandings were called “Poona Pact”, having far reaching implications for the integration of the depressed and oppressed masses with the main stream of society.
My forthcoming book “Some Random Thoughts on Babasaheb Ambedkar and His Legacy – The Bits and Pieces”, likely to be launched soon, carries my blog on the subject as Chapter 18 at page 93 – Analytical Commentary on Poona Pact of 1932. The Foreword
of the book has been written by, General Secretary of Federation of Ambedkarite and Buddhist Organisations (FABO) of UK, Arun Kumar, a staunch Ambedkarite. I take this opportunity to thank Ambedkar Times Inc spearheaded by Chief Editor of the Ambedkar Times and The Desh Doaba for extending all support in publishing the book.
Chapter 18 of the
forthcoming book – Some Random Thoughts on Babasaheb Ambedkar and His Legacy –
The Bits and Pieces
Analytical Commentary
on Poona Pact of 1932
I have written about Poona Pact of 1932 signed between
Mahatma Gandhi and Babasaheb Ambedkar a couple of times before and gave my
views. The anniversary of the Pact falls on September 24. Editor Prem Chumber
of the Ambedkar Times invited me to write a piece on the subject for the
esteemed paper. I was a bit lethargic as much has been said and written on the
subject and moreover now, it has no practical relevance and it has gone to the
realm of history. An immediate provocation to say something again on Poona Pact
was the video message of a staunch Ambedkarite and an intellectual living legend
Lahori Ram Balley which I heard on Facebook a little while ago. I am not
inclined to go to the facts and figures in this regard and would limit myself
to a running commentary on the importance of Poona Pact and how it contributed
in bringing the depressed classes on the political map and agenda of India in
the subsequent landmark events of India Act, 1935 and finally the Constitution
of India. In fact, in other words, it turns out to be a tribute to the sagacity
and integrity of the one of the greatest sons of India, Babasaheb Ambedkar on
one hand and the suspect attitude of Mahatma Gandhi in blackmailing Ambedkar to
watch and protect the interests of the Hindu society at large at the cost of
dalits on one hand and the treachery of the ruling elite after independence on
the other by not faithfully implementing the special provisions made for the
Scheduled Castes to give practical shape to the understandings stipulated in
the Poona Pact in all sincerity and solemnity. I think, that is why, later
Ambedkar himself termed the Pact a “mean deal” as it could not deliver as
promised and visualized both by the society and also by the polity.
The Separate Electorates to the depressed Classes in line
with the similar provisions for Muslims, Christians, Sikhs etc granted in the
Communal Award of PM Ramsey MacDonald was the result of Ambedkar’s untiring
efforts and assertions at the Round Table Conferences much against the agenda
and wishes of Mahatma Gandhi who wanted dalits to remain in the fold of Hindus.
Mahatma Gandhi tried his best to convince the British rulers in Delhi and
London to undo the Separate Electorates offered to dalits in the Communal Award
but failed. He flouted his usual weapon of “fast” to exploit and compel the
British rulers on one hand and also the recognized leader of depressed classes,
Babasaheb Ambedkar on the other. Gandhi started his “fast unto death” in the
Yerawada jail in Poona where he was detained. It was one of the cunning tactics
of caste Hindus led by Gandhi to stop a separate identity of dalits and to
defeat Ambedkar. The whole country was made to stand and oppose separate
electorates to the depressed classes. The atmosphere was so vitiated with
hatred that Babasaheb was condemned as anti-national and anti- Hindu. He was
threatened to be killed before something untoward happened to Gandhi. The wife
of Gandh, Kasturba made appeals of mercy to Babasaheb to save the life of her
husband. Hindu fundamentalists like Babu Rajendra Prasad, C. Rajagopalachari,
Madan Mohan Malaviya among others appealed and requested Babasaheb Ambedkar to
save the life of Gandhi by rejecting the separate electorates to dalits and
remaining in the Hindu fold. It was a very difficult and critical preposition
before the sole leader of the depressed classes. On one side, he was to abandon
and forego voluntarily the gains and advantage he himself achieved at the Round
Table Conferences and otherwise for the benefit of the depressed classes and on
the other to prove his credentials as a nationalist and a caring leader for the
overall good of the main stream of the society. There were threats to his life.
Balley Sahib in his message which I mentioned before narrated a historical fact
of an editorial written by Mahasha Krishan in the Urdu paper The Partap
published from Lahore where he threatened that Ambedkar must be careful and
considerate in taking the decision as dictated by the Hindu leaders led by
Mahatma Gandhi otherwise before the final rites of the Mahatma, if he died in
his “fast unto death, the funeral of Ambedkar would be held before that. One
can easily gauge the gravity of the situation. Ambedkar was not only a
consummate intellectual politician who not only knew the universally accepted
dictum ‘politics is an art of the possible’ but also subscribed to the lofty ideals
of compassion and morality of the Buddha. As a true nationalist and recognizing
the value of Mahatma Gandhi’s role as a leading light of the freedom movement
and also his preference to bring about cohesiveness in the society at large
instead of ushering the country into communal divide and hatred decided to
cooperate and agreed to the submissions of Mahatma Gandhi and other Hindu
leaders which resulted in the famous Poona Pact of 1932. Babasaheb Ambedkar was
a negotiator par excellence. He tried his best and convinced the Hindu leaders
to see the situation of the depressed classes in the Hindu fold and do
something concrete to ameliorate their sufferings in the Manuwadi set up. There
was no option with the Gandhi camp. In the Poona Pact, Ambedkar got more
facilities and enabling provisions for the depressed classes than offered in
the Communal Award by the British rulers. Not only the reserved seats in the
legislature but also special provisions in education and socio-economic aspects
with a view to integrate dalits with the main stream of the society as equal
partners. With this the much maligned concept of ‘Reservation” was born which
finally found enumeration in the Constitution of India of which Babasaheb
himself was the architect and pilot. The opponents of ‘Reservation” for dalits
are ill-informed and half educated that nobody offered the special provisions
of reservation etc. on the platter out of magnanimity and compassion but were
achieved with ardent and consistent efforts and sacrifices by Dr. Ambedkar and
his associates and the suffering masses. The spirit of Poona Pact will remain
alive under the overall impact and implementation of the Constitution of India.
The only negation which comes to my mind is that by foregoing the separate
electorates, dalits lost an edge in electing their true representatives in the
parliament, legislatures and municipal bodies. Perhaps this is the reason by
Manyawar Kanshi Ram called them “Chamchas” and some of the dalit activists
opposed the Poona Pact. Let us leave it to historians to judge and give their
verdict.
All said and done, I have no hesitation in saying that
whatever Ambedkar Sahib did and accomplished in signing the Poona Pact was a
master-stroke in the given times and circumstances under difficult and trying
conditions. Babasaheb proved himself as a great and visionary leader. With
this, I remember Poona Pact of 1932 the harbinger of political and social space
for dalits in the map of India. I Salute to Babasaheb Ambedkar.
No comments:
Post a Comment