It is obvious that India-Pakistan
relations are going from bad to worse by the day. The terrorist attack of
November 29 at Nagrota army camp in Jammu is the latest in the series of such
attacks from Pathankot to Uri from Uri to Nagrota and one does know what is in store
in the coming days. No
amount of hard talk, diplomatic maneuvers, and surgical
strike across the LOC has worked to stop and deter Pakistan from its nefarious
designs to bleed India. What should we do? The question is engaging the
government and the opposition, the intelligentsia and the public at large and
rightly so. The loss of life and property, both military and private, is
resulting in undue and inflicted trauma on the families of the shaheeds and
also common people. No easy and early solution is in sight. But the situation
has to be tackled and met with determined and dispassionate response.
Pakistan, from day one, is hell bent
to create problems for India. It is all well documented in history. There is no
need to repeat it. Now the situation is such that Pakistan is virtually on an
undeclared war with India by other means i.e. proxy war. Their main weapon in
this war is terrorism through human exploitation i.e. Fidayeen mode. Nobody has
any effective shield to counter such ways. But it is for certain that the
terror outfits operating in and from Pakistan cannot survive without support
and involvement of Pakistan’s armed forces, intelligence agencies and the
government. We need to deal with a cunning enemy. The idea is not to provide
detailed facts and figures but come straight to the question. How should we
deal with Pakistan from a lay man’s – Aam Aadmi’s perspective?
There is no easy solution, given
the ground realities and international situation. It is also getting
increasingly clear that nobody else can help in solving the problems between
the two counties. India and Pakistan themselves ought to do it, the sooner the
better. An out-right war is a dreadful
option and both sides will think a hundred times to consider that to settle the
matter, given the nuclear power status of both India and Pakistan. Let the war
be a last resort, if we both want to finish ourselves.
There can be a two pronged approach
to address the security situation and overall settlement with Pakistan:
Immediate and short term option –
· Increase
the border security and the cost to Pakistan for their mischief either by their
armed forces or state sponsored terrorists.
· Adopt “Tit
for Tat” policy not in equal measure but with strong and loaded response both
at the international border and the line of control (LOC) with the intention to
inflict heavy and visible losses to the enemy.
· Conduct
surgical strikes on the training camps, launch pads and support mechanism
within Pakistan territory to hit the terrorists and their masters. There is no
point in giving any proofs, justifications to Pakistan or any other country.
The only explanation is to ‘teach them a lesson’.
· Covert and
Overt operations to neutralize terrorist outfits, their assets and their
leadership in Pakistan. The fear of such an action should always linger in the
minds of the Aaqas of terrorists.
· Exploit,
support and encourage, without inhibition, Baloch and Sindh separatist
movements in Pakistan by all means.
· Exploit and
support the up-risings in POK against the Pakistan government and people.
· Unleash the
propaganda war in the media – print and electronic and also the social media to
educate and convince the people – Awaam of Pakistan of the wrong policies of
Pakistan army and the terror outfits and also of the government.
Long term options –
·
Intensify diplomatic offensive against Pakistan in
international and regional fora both bilaterally and multi-laterally to isolate
Pakistan on the issue of cross border terrorism and nuclear blackmail and
clandestine commerce.
·
Put in place ‘Track Two Diplomacy’ with Pakistan by
identifying suitable and potent interlocutors within or outside Pakistan.
·
Engage diplomatically with the Pakistan government,
army brass and intelligence agencies and also the intelligentsia in whatever
way or means possible and feasible. Diplomacy has to remain on track as
ultimately there is no option but to sit and talk. There is no other way.
The Final option “Out of the Box” settlement –
· What is the
solution? It seems both the sides are feeling fatigue. Something drastic has to
be done with a dispassionate approach as an “Out of the Box” solution on the
principles of give and take. It would amount to put in considerable efforts to
create conducive atmosphere and public opinion on both the sides in favour of
status quo. It is a huge task but there is no other option. I wrote about this
about a year ago on December 31, 2015 in this blog of mine under the caption
“Out of the Box Diplomacy” – India-Pakistan relations. It is a difficult
decision and many people may not like to voice it. But somebody has to do it.
As I said in the preceding paras, this write up is in no way a detailed
analysis of the issue but a humble and feeble attempt to generate a debate in
approaching the solution through ‘Out of the Box Diplomacy’.
· The Give
and Take approach was suggested by a visionary leader, Dr. B.R. Ambedkar in
1949 itself. He said and I quote from an article written by Dr. K.
Jamnadas ‘Kashmir Problem from Ambedkarite Perspective’, “Even about Kashmir, the issue on
which we are fighting, who is in the right and who is in the wrong. The real
issue to my mind, he said, is not who is in the right but what is right and he
observed: "... my view has always been that the right solution is to
partition Kashmir. Give the Hindu and Buddhist part to India and the Muslim
part to Pakistan as we did in the case of India. We are really not concerned
with the Muslim part of Kashmir. It is a matter between the Muslims of Kashmir
and Pakistan. They may decide the issue, as they like or if you like, divide it
into three parts; the Cease-fire zone, the Valley and the Jammu-Ladakh Region
and have a plebiscite only in the Valley. What I am afraid of is that in the
proposed plebiscite, which is to be an overall plebiscite, the Hindus and
Buddhists of Kashmir are likely to be dragged into Pakistan against their
wishes and we may have to face the same problems as we are facing today in East
Bengal."
· Dr.
Ambedkar was a genius. The solution given by him was pragmatic and was not
based on misplaced emotions. Had PM Jawaharlal Nehru listened to him, both the
newly independent countries would not have suffered the economic burden of
defense of the long border and also the subsequent full blown wars and often
repeated border skirmishes resulting in constant hostility between the two
neighbors. Even after 68 long years, the solution still lies somewhere close to
Dr. Ambedkar’s thinking. PM Indira Gandhi and PM Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, it is
said, agreed in 1972 at the time of Simla Agreement to convert the Line of
Control (LOC) into international border and settle the core issue of Kashmir.
It could not happen. The Nobel Peace Prize eluded them. PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee
was interested in making history and he tried with PM Nawaz Sharif and
President Pervez Musharraf but failed. PM Manmohan Singh and President Pervez
Musharraf picked up the threads and thought of making the LOC and International
border between India and Pakistan “irrelevant” and become the contenders for
the coveted peace prize. But again it was not to be. Somebody else is destined
to make history. Will they be PM Narendra Modi and PM Nawaz Sharif? Only time
will tell.
· We all
know that the Kashmir issue cannot be solved by either side by force. Both India and Pakistan are nuclear
powers. The stakes are too high. Nobody will be interested in making it a flash
point for the unimaginable holocaust. The leaderships of both India and
Pakistan and the people on both the sides and also the international community
are not oblivious of these ground realities. The international scenario is
changing fast in view of cross border terrorism and regional conflicts. The
challenges of development and environment are needed to be addressed to save
humanity. The “Out of the Box” solutions and approaches are needed. The
festering problem of Kashmir and the emerging situation in Afghanistan needs
immediate attention. Both India and Pakistan are required to rise to the occasion
to ward of the imminent dangers of allowing the situation to worsen. Given
the background of PM Narendra Modi, he has an image of a hawk in Pakistan. It becomes all the more difficult
for him to do business with Pakistani leadership particularly that of the Pak
army and Islamic fundamentalists. On the other hand, it appears that PM
Narendra Modi intends to steal the show and make history by adopting an “Out of
the Box” approach. He invited PM Nawaz Sharif to his swearing in ceremony in
May, 2014 along with his other SAARC counterparts, registering diplomatic
deftness on his part. In spite of usual ups and downs in relations with
Pakistan, PM Narendra Modi kept the diplomatic routes open. From Ufa to Paris,
he did not leave any opportunity to engage Pakistan in constructive dialogue.
Addressing the army commanders recently, PM Modi said, setting the agenda, “We
are engaging Pakistan to try and turn the corners of history, bringing an end
to terrorism, build peaceful relations, advance cooperation and promote
stability and prosperity in the region.” The NSAs of India and Pakistan,
Ajit Doval and Nasser Janjua respectively met in Bangkok followed by the visit
of EAM Sushma Swaraj to Islamabad in December itself to pave the way for
“Comprehensive Bilateral Dialogue” which was stalled due to the vicious
bitterness and mistrust existing in the relationship with Pakistan. PM Narendra
Modi’s unscheduled visit to Lahore on December 25 on the birthday of PM Nawaz
Sharif, PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee, and Quaid-e-Azam Muhammad Ali Jinnah was a
diplomatic masterstroke to engage Pakistan in the process of creating history.
Let us hope, the process continues and the desired results obtained.
· It is not
an easy task. Pakistan has to tone-down the rhetoric of “Kashmir is the jugular
vein of Pakistan” and shed and shun the policy of exporting terrorism. India
being a big country in the region should be more accommodative and magnanimous
in dealing with its estranged brother. The government of PM Narendra Modi, with
a clear majority in the Lok Sabha, should create political and diplomatic
consensus on the issues of conflict and contention within the country. The
civil society should be prepared to engage with Pakistan by encouraging people
to people contacts. Cultural bonds should be nurtured. The opportunities for
the two way trade between the two countries should be explored, identified and
exploited. The likes of Ram Madhav, the votary of ‘Akhand Bharat’, should be
asked to shut up. The forces of understanding and friendship should be
unleashed to create a conducive atmosphere for meaningful dialogue to solve the
vexed problems to mutual benefit and advantage.
· It is
easier said than done. But there is, it seems, a growing feeling of tiredness
on both sides. There is a growing realization that force and
undiplomatic
methods cannot solve the problems and challenges generated by history. Let us
consider and opt for the policy of ‘give and take’ as advised by Dr. B.R.
Ambedkar, of course, with necessary adjustments which may be required to
address the current situation. Let us wish the leaderships
The Final
Solution –“Out of the Box” Settlement as stated above is a repeat of what I
said a year before in December, 2015. I may be excused, if there are some
repetitions. Subsequent to that Gurdaspur, Pathankot, Uri and now Nagrota
attacks and loss of unprecedented life and property have provoked me to write
this again. Kashmiri leader Farooq Abdullah has also expressed his opinion
recently when he said that in 70 years Pakistan could not get Kashmir from us
and similarly we could not take back POK from Pakistan and it will be difficult
to do that by either side. Let us understand this and engage ourselves to
settle all outstanding issues peacefully.
शक्ति भी शांति भी भक्तों के गीत में है;
दुनिया के बासियों की मुक्ति प्रीत में है !
This is a wonderful article, suggesting final solution to long spoiled & exploited Kashmir issue. This is news to me that Dr B R Ambedkar gave these views after partition and the same hold most relevant today.
ReplyDeleteBefore I give my views on this problem, I would like to highlight the background & present position. In fact lot of water has passed under the Indo-Pak bridges and I feel its better to understand it in reverse starting from today.
Kashmir is unlike any terrorist issue. The so called "Terrorist' are not attacking business or tourists but are attacking Head-on Army, BSF, CRPF & Police. They are attacking their headquarters. Today we have about 6 Lakh security forces for the local population of about 60 Lakhs, i.e. 1 security fellow for 10 citizens. This is a sort of record and our soldiers are fighting an avoidable war of fighting against its own people. Unfortunately sodiers are fighting to the ego & whims & fancies of the politicians. It will not be wrong to accept their claim that they are fighting for their independence for the last 69 years. The first part of problem is to decide whether this is a terrorist problem or not. Pakistan has not shied away from it & has always admitted that their country including their Parliament & Security Forces are giving direct & indirect help for liberation of Kashmir valley. Now from the day of Partition, this fight has been carried over to third generation & it can not be branded as a terrorist activity. In fact its their fight for freedom, for that any one may call me traitor or Pakistani. But I am not examining from the Pakistan's view-point but from the 70 year old Kashmir history of the locals.
Going to the background, its the wrong & selfish interest of Nehru to entangle both the countries in turmoil for nearly seven decades for his child like sticking to valley being his birth place. All successive governments in India & Pakistan have only played to their selfish end to keep Kashmir issue burning that helps all politician of both countries.
My suggestion is that India should call the Kashmiri Stake holders (not Pak Government) for discussion & should declare that India principally want to declare independence to Kashmir to decide their future course of action, say in a period of 6 months & Indian forces can continue to be in valley for that period after which they will withdraw completely. In my opinion, it should be none of India's worry whether they want to go with Pakistan or they want to go independent. After this 6 months period come to en end, India should stick to their word of withdrawl. I am sure, Kashmir will start fight with Pakistan to declare POK also as a part of Azad Kashmir, not after 6 months but during such transition itself. This will shift Indian border from Muzzafarbad to somewhere on Jammu/Valley border that is at the altitude of over 11000 feet & will act as a natural border, difficult to cross that easily by Kashmiris or Pakistanis. It will further act as a direct border with Pakistan. The area of terrorism is going to shift between Valley & POK. Our forces can see some better life & our economy can can avoid big hit.
The suggestion of Kashmir freedom referred by me in the above comments about giving freedom to Kashmir valley only, keeping Leh/Ladakh & Jammu with India.
ReplyDeletethanks jogonder palji. somebody has to take the lead and take the problem head on. let us see and ensure, no more blood letting and wastage of scare sources and assets just for the hack of it standing on false egos.
Deletecheap golden goose
ReplyDeleteoff white outlet
hermes outlet online
supreme new york
off white shoes
cheap birkin bag
off white jordan
palm angels outlet
hermes outlet
bape