President Trump – Diplomatic Idiosyncrasies
Diplomatic and political eccentricities are often marked by unusual or unconventional behavior that can be humorous, insightful, or even unsettling. These days President Donald Trump has become a butt of jokes with his eccentricities in dealing with the world, irrespective of friends and foes. With his recent policies and actions, more so in recent months, he has falsified what his predecessor, President George W. Bush said, “For diplomacy to be effective, words must be credible.” I will focus on a couple of statements and actions of President Trump with regard to his unpredictable and not-understandable dealings with India and its leadership. While time will give its verdict in due course, prima facie, President Trump has clearly shown his disdain to both diplomatic and political sensitivities in his unreasonable and avoidable behavior.
First, President Trump’s claims on his role in halting the hostilities and armed conflict between India and Pakistan in the wake of brutal happenings of Pahalgam in J&K and Operation Sindoor in April-May, 2025. India does not admit, as matter of policy, any third party role in relations with Pakistan and intends to settle all issues with Pakistan bilaterally. President Trump or anyone else must have
intervened and advised both India and Pakistan to refrain and control the conflict both publicly and otherwise. Both India and Pakistan, in their judgment and decision, agreed to the ceasefire on May 10. Without any diplomatic regard to the sensitivities, President Trump preempted and announced the decision on his social handles before it was made known by the parties, India and Pakistan. It was highly unbecoming of a leader of a friendly country, President Trump to embarrass a friendly country, India and its leader, PM Narendra Modi, a professed dear friend of Trump. The behavior of President Trump and also its Administration is out rightly undiplomatic and unfriendly. India has shown a considerable restraint and diplomatic maturity in responding to the US affront in the larger interests of India-US relations, the two mature and established democracies. It seems, President Trump has been bitten by the award called Nobel Prize for Peace. Prizes are not demanded but earned and deserved.
The First trickled to the Second – the trade war, unilaterally
inflicted by President Trump on India and many other countries. The trade
negotiations have been called off and the new tariff structures are announced
every day. From 25% to 50% and ‘lot more secondary
sanctions’ have been levied
on Indian exports to the US. The
rationale given by the US Administration for these ‘unfair and unreasonable’ tariff structures, matching duties bilaterally and punishment of oil imports from Russia, are not based on diplomatic and political understandings between the two countries but on sheer whims and fancies of the world power called the USA. India has rightly termed these as ‘unjustified and unreasonable’ and has asserted that it would take all necessary measures to “safeguard its national interests and economic security like any major economy”.
The real reasons are the sheer eccentricities of President
Trump and nothing else. India has hurt the ‘Ego and Nobel Aspirations’ of
President Trump by not endorsing his self-proclaimed mediations in averting the
conflict, perceived nuclear war, between the two nuclear powers, India and
Pakistan. US has signed, to affront India, an agreement with Pakistan to
exploit its oil reserves and even have had the undiplomatic temerity to say
that in the future India would import oil from Pakistan. These diplomatic idiosyncrasies
of Trump would adversely affect good and friendly bonds of cooperation between India
and the US.
It seems that President Trump is following the famous dictum of Napolean Bonaparte, "In politics, stupidity is not a handicap." Let it be but the question is what India needs to do to meet the challenge as a dignified and sovereign country. As of now, Indian leadership and its diplomatic machinery have made things clear both in the matter of halting of conflict with Pakistan and role of President Trump and its Administration that there was no role and scope of third party in bilateral matters between India and Pakistan and has also clearly termed the US ‘Tariff War’ as ‘unfair and unreasonable’. India has also refused to ‘bow down’ to the US dictates. No more and no less. India needs to stick to its guns. The days of ‘goody-goody’ treatment are over. India has faced many ups and downs since its
independence. The US and its Administration had not been reasonable towards India viz a viz Pakistan. India, the largest democracy and the fast growing economy with more than 1.4 billion people, is a force to reckon with. I recall a quote from an American President, John F. Kennedy, “Let us never negotiate out of fear. But let us never fear to negotiate.” India is in a position to follow John F. Kennedy. As regards vocal responses to all the googlies and machinations of President Trump, I would tend agree with PM Atal Bihari Vajpayee who said, “Quiet diplomacy is far more effective than public posturing.” We are to make pragmatic and considered decision to Make India Great Again – MIGA, come what may. I conclude this with a poetic composition of Bahadur Shah Zafar which exactly explains the state of mind and eccentricities of President Trump:
ज़फ़र' आदमी उस को न जानिएगा वो हो कैसा ही साहब-ए-फ़हम-ओ-ज़का
जिसे ऐश में याद-ए-ख़ुदा न रही जिसे तैश में ख़ौफ़-ए-ख़ुदा न रहा
Tailpiece – I am reading these days the book – A Life in Diplomacy, a biographical
account of Ambassador Maharaj Krishna Rasgotra. I quote here a paragraph from
the book which sets the tone of India-Us relations from the early years of our
independence –
“But the relations between India and the US continued to decline, not because of Dulles’s (Secretary of State) condemnation of India’s
Non-alignment policy as evil but because he considered India’s policies concerning China and other Asian issues – the Korean truce negotiations, the Japanese peace treaty etc. as anti-America, pro-communist and pro-Soviet Russia. Vice President who entertained similar views had visited India and Pakistan in 1952. He was lionized in Pakistan but in India he was given VIP treatment appropriate, protocol; wise, to his status. On return, he complained that his meetings with Nehru were a long lecture by the PM on world affairs as if he (Nixon) was an ignorant novice. Consequentially, he nursed a lifelong grudge against India, Nehru and his daughter Indira. He did his worst to spread prejudice against India in Washington’s political circles.”
A Life in Diplomacy – Chapter 6 – Washington DC: Early
Warnings of an Indo-US Rift